From: Preben Randhol <randhol+news@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: Status of GCC-GNAT versus GNAT 3.14-3.15
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:14:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2002-09-24T10:14:07+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnap0eng.1q8.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3d901c56$0$10505$626a54ce@news.free.fr
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:05:43 +0200, nicolas wrote:
>
> If you are willing to build gcc 3.3 on Windows, you'll have to do that
No I'm using Linux. I ask as I see that debian is now building gnat 3.2
in unstable. Gnat 3.14 is in the stable distribution so I'll keep using
this until a gnat 3.x comes that are as stable as gnat 3.14 (or more).
I guess the biggest problem is to get the compiler to work with the
newer gcc backend ?
Preben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-24 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-22 9:50 Status of GCC-GNAT versus GNAT 3.14-3.15 Preben Randhol
2002-09-22 22:38 ` chris.danx
2002-09-23 12:45 ` chris.danx
2002-09-24 8:05 ` nicolas
2002-09-24 10:14 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2002-09-24 12:19 ` nicolas
2002-09-24 20:21 ` chris.danx
2002-09-24 20:25 ` chris.danx
2002-09-24 23:11 ` Preben Randhol
2002-09-23 17:02 ` Jerry van Dijk
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox