comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: Need advice: Enumerate or not
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 19:05:12 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2002-05-16T19:05:12+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnae80n8.126.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ubsbgdz36.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov

On 16 May 2002 09:03:25 -0400, Stephen Leake wrote:

> No, the child package where the actual operation is defined does _not_
> need to be visible for dispatching to happen. That is crucial to the
> dispatching design; the top level Update procedure can be written with
> _no_ knowledge of what procedures are actually dispatched to.

But as I said these objects are in different packages which are not 
child packages of a package. Doe they need to be?

> This is done by making the root operation abstract; then the compiler
> ensures that each derived type supplies an update function.

Yes I have done this in my Common_Dialog package as there I have a
"root" package which has an abstract type that the child packages
derive. In my other case I don't have that.

-- 
Preben



  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-16 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-15  9:42 Need advice: Enumerate or not Preben Randhol
2002-05-15 12:26 ` Jim Rogers
2002-05-15 14:24   ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-16 13:03     ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-16 19:05       ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2002-05-15 18:00   ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-05-16  0:31     ` Jim Rogers
2002-05-16  2:37     ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-16 10:22       ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-16 17:36       ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox