From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.02
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2002-01-03T15:38:53+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrna38uoa.fbt.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: qL_Y7.2172$cD4.3565@www.newsranger.com
On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:27:18 GMT, Ted Dennison wrote:
> In article <slrna38rib.btr.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>, Preben
> Randhol says...
>>But I would rather have a tested gcc-gnat out in a while than something
>>ASAP that might be bugging and thus give gcc-gnat a bad rep.
>
> True. But if its a 3.1 distro, the other stuff is just as liable to be buggy.
Yes
--
() Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.
'||}
{||' http://www.amnesty.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-03 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-02 19:04 GNAT and GCC 3.02 Mr. Caffiene
2002-01-02 19:41 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-02 21:46 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-03 9:49 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-01-03 11:40 ` Preben Randhol
2002-01-03 13:06 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-03 14:44 ` Preben Randhol
2002-01-03 15:27 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-03 15:38 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2002-01-03 21:49 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-03 21:47 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-04 14:48 ` off-topic (wandering away from GNAT and GCC 3.02) Wes Groleau
2002-01-05 12:00 ` Florian Weimer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-03 23:19 GNAT and GCC 3.02 Anh Vo
2002-01-05 4:22 ` Steve Doiel
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox