From: whraven@usenet-access.com (Richard Pinkall-Pollei)
Subject: Re: Inexpensive Ada Compiler
Date: 22 Oct 2001 12:29:17 -0500
Date: 2001-10-22T12:29:17-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrn9t8mlb.3dp.whraven@raven.wri> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0110211450.6dde7f78@posting.google.com
>> >Why not GNAT?
>>
>> If you need support it is definitely not inexpensive...
>
>Read the thread, this is a student who is asking the question, and
>most certainly the public version of GNAT is
>suitable for student use, and he should be able to get the
>informal help needed from the community. Indeed, the primary purpose
>of the public versions of GNAT is to support this kind of student
>use!
Add to that the fact that the public versions are only released after
they have been in use for some time by ACT customers. It doesn't mean
they're bug free, but they've been very stable for me.
--
I tried sniffing Coke, but the ice cubes got stuck in my nose.
______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Binaries.net = SPEED+RETENTION+COMPLETION = http://www.binaries.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-22 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-21 0:36 Inexpensive Ada Compiler William Forbes
2001-10-21 3:42 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-21 4:51 ` tmoran
2001-10-21 12:56 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-21 12:59 ` Israel R T
2001-10-21 13:06 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-21 22:50 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-22 17:29 ` Richard Pinkall-Pollei [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-02-24 0:00 Mike Willour
1997-02-24 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox