From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 18:48:35 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2001-10-09T18:48:35+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrn9s6hk3.vs4.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0110090930.5274699a@posting.google.com
* Robert Dewar wrote:
>Good to hear that you got a clean build.
Today I managed a full bootstrap and build even the libs without any problem.
Linking a small example to the real executable works. Example does the
requested job. I'm missing gnatmake ;-/.
>Remember to report any problems to report@gnat.com (you can also use the
>standard gcc process), but errors reported to CLA go into the ether :-)
I do not report errors without a detailed reproducable example.
I'd like to inform cla about the success and good quality. (Small examples
tend to grow in Size and Time when switching on optimization, because all
working data is required to go though CPU registers even if this is not
necessary.)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 13:40 FYI: GNAT and GCC Florian Weimer
2001-10-02 14:14 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-10-02 18:22 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 4:04 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-02 19:24 ` mike
2001-10-02 20:10 ` 3-13p or 3-14a1 Frank
2001-10-02 21:10 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-02 21:26 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-03 4:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 7:00 ` Frank
2001-10-03 4:42 ` FYI: GNAT and GCC Ian S. Nelson
2001-10-03 16:12 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 20:52 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-04 11:38 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-04 12:46 ` Florian Weimer
2001-10-04 2:53 ` Ian S. Nelson
2001-10-05 13:42 ` Dale Pontius
2001-10-08 15:19 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-10-09 17:30 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-09 18:48 ` Lutz Donnerhacke [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox