From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: why? US Army Ada software converted to C++?
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 00:10:45 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2001-10-08T00:10:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrn9s2325.idh.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3BC0D083.546674E5@worldnet.att.net
On Sun, 07 Oct 2001 22:00:22 GMT, James Rogers wrote:
> Brian Rogoff wrote:
>>
>> Indeed. And all of this talk of switching to C++ for weapons systems is
>> scary. I guess we can be thankful that the DOD hasn't switched to Perl,
>> yet...
>
> Not Perl, but there has been movement toward Java.
Oh? Not VB either? Do they want to shot missiles from a web page using
IE on their nice Windows NT run ships? ;-)
Preben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-08 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-06 21:56 why? US Army Ada software converted to C++? rob
2001-10-06 23:35 ` David Emery
2001-10-07 1:16 ` Jim44.
2001-10-07 7:31 ` tmoran
2001-10-07 21:22 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-07 22:00 ` James Rogers
2001-10-07 23:59 ` Dale Stanbrough
2001-10-08 0:10 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2001-10-09 18:12 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-09 19:05 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-09 20:36 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-09 22:01 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-07 1:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-10-07 12:09 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-09 16:03 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-08 0:28 ` Richard Riehle
2001-10-08 0:39 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-08 3:26 ` Pi
2001-10-09 16:06 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-08 10:41 ` Petter Fryklund
2001-10-08 13:20 ` Alfred Hilscher
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox