From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Subject: Re: Multiple entry tasks
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:19:38 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2001-04-24T09:19:38+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrn9eah3i.hj.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccy9sw7e28.fsf@world.std.com
* Robert A Duff wrote:
>Under the Priority_Queueing policy, the entries are prioritized -- you
>write the higher-priority accepts before the lower-priority ones. Task
>priorities take precedence over entry priorities, however. I'm not
>sure whether that's what the original poster wanted, but if all the
>tasks are the same priority, then the order of the accept statements
>determines the priority of the entries.
Thank you. That's the last one of a lot of very useful hints. I came to the
conclusion, that in every situation where a posting to cla is necessary the
code design is wrong anyway. So postings to cla are a sure sign of bad
programming ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-24 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-18 14:57 Multiple entry tasks Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-04-18 16:22 ` Marin David Condic
2001-04-18 18:12 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-18 18:57 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-18 20:16 ` Marin David Condic
2001-04-19 14:02 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-19 14:28 ` Marin David Condic
2001-04-18 19:46 ` Marin David Condic
2001-04-19 21:52 ` Robert A Duff
2001-04-24 9:19 ` Lutz Donnerhacke [this message]
2001-04-19 8:17 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-04-19 14:42 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-19 15:01 ` Marin David Condic
2001-04-19 15:02 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-04-19 19:12 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-20 14:17 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-04-20 19:04 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-23 6:55 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-04-23 13:50 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox