From: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk (Aidan Skinner)
Subject: Re: Any have GNAT running on linux
Date: 1999/07/23
Date: 1999-07-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrn7pft3s.hv0.aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 37933F96.2D74@worldnet.att.net
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 15:09:10 +0000, James Bean
<Jim-bean@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>My 2 cents worth of strategy is to stay with RH 5.2 and just update the
>kernel as required (am presently running 2.3.6 OK). RH even has a very
There are rpms of GNAT 3.11p linked from
http://www.cs.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/linux-ada/ that run quite happily on
this RedHat 6.0 box (just as they ran on it when it was running Redhat
5.2 and 5.0) and don't interfere with egcs (which is the default C
compiler on 6, a tad irritatingly IMO).
Perhaps this should go in the FAQ?
- Aidan
--
http://www.skinner.demon.co.uk/aidan/
How much can could ICANN can if ICANN could can-can?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-07-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-07-13 0:00 Any have GNAT running on linux Richard Wallace
1999-07-14 0:00 ` Alex
1999-07-18 0:00 ` Pascal MALAISE
1999-07-18 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1999-07-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-19 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1999-07-19 0:00 ` James Bean
1999-07-23 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner [this message]
1999-07-23 0:00 ` ronald
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox