From: aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk (Aidan Skinner)
Subject: Re: Catchy name for library
Date: 1999/05/13
Date: 1999-05-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrn7jm4c8.i2.aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 37384956.CBC6B6C7@pwfl.com
On Tue, 11 May 1999 11:14:30 -0400, Marin David Condic
<condicma@bogon.pwfl.com> wrote:
>IMHO, if you pick some subset of the proposed component library and come
>up with a good implementation, it will likely find acceptance.
On a related note, what are peoples opinion of the naming of the
nntp/smtp packages in libra? They are currently under
Libra.ARPA.[NNTP|SMTP], as they both pass ARPA messages from RFC 822,
but it has been suggested that it isn't entirely clear to people who are
relatively new to internet programming what ARPA is.
- Aidan
--
http://www.skinner.demon.co.uk
Real men whistle ed commands at 300 baud into a can.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-05-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-11 0:00 Catchy name for library Nick Roberts
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner [this message]
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Leake dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox