From: aklee@spam.this.interport.net (Albert K. Lee)
Subject: Re: Pragma and Object Files
Date: 1998/04/16
Date: 1998-04-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrn6jcp90.agb.aklee@interport.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 35361C04.2BC8@gsfc.nasa.gov
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998 10:56:04 -0400, Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote:
>Albert K. Lee wrote:
>>
>> An .obj file is an .o file, there is no difference ... DOS uses an
>> .obj file extension while many other OS's use .o instead.
>
>Sorry, but no. There are many different object file formats. Borland,
>Microsoft, and GNAT are all different from each other. I don't know of
>any way to directly convert one format to another, but there may be
>something like that in the gnu bintools (but gnu bintools probably don't
>know about Borland object format!).
>
>You'll have to compile the assembler code with the gnu assembler. I
>don't know if the assembler syntax is the same; the opcode mnemonics
>probably are, but the macro language is probably different.
>
>Good Luck!
Sorry. Where I come from (that is, the distant past), Intel specified
a common .obj format. MASM code was easily linked with Turbo Pascal
and so on. Is this not the case anymore?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-04-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-04-13 0:00 Pragma and Object Files Andy Pekrins
1998-04-14 0:00 ` Anonymous
1998-04-14 0:00 ` Andy Perkins
1998-04-14 0:00 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
1998-04-14 0:00 ` William Tanksley
1998-04-14 0:00 ` Geert Bosch
1998-04-14 0:00 ` Andy Perkins
1998-04-16 0:00 ` Albert K. Lee
1998-04-16 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1998-04-16 0:00 ` Albert K. Lee [this message]
1998-04-21 0:00 ` William Tanksley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox