From: Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: GtkAda License Question
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:11:52 +0200
Date: 2006-06-21T19:11:52+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <skub7e.4vj.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hl7j3c2lq8.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
M E Leypold a �crit :
> So all current practice of distributing GPL software is flawed insofar
> as the COPYYING and README files don't establish a binding agreement
> between the receiver and the author of the software? So the receiver
> has actually find the author (or copyright holder) to ascertain the
> licensing terms and if he finds him, it might be that the copyright
> holder decides that today there are different licensing terms for this
> applicant?
>
COPYING and README are not *proofs*, that's what he meant. Anybody can
take propriatory software and redistribute it with a COPYING file (or
change the headers); this won't make the software free. What Robert said
is that if you want legal assurance that the software is free, you need
a signed letter from the author.
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-21 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-19 11:11 GtkAda License Question M E Leypold
2006-06-19 11:48 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-19 20:28 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-20 5:11 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-20 8:46 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-06-20 9:57 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-21 17:11 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen [this message]
2006-06-21 18:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-21 21:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-20 13:31 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-20 13:42 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-06-20 15:03 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-20 15:25 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-20 6:12 ` Björn Persson
2006-06-20 7:51 ` gshapovalov
2006-06-20 7:48 ` gshapovalov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox