From: shochat@primenet.com (David D. Shochat)
Subject: Re: ada for pc(dos an linux)
Date: 1996/01/08
Date: 1996-01-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <shochat-0801960610300001@ip009.lax.primenet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DKCGu6.7GD@irvine.com
In article <DKCGu6.7GD@irvine.com>, dan@irvine.com (Dan Eilers) wrote:
[snip]
>
> As far as policy goes, AJPO policy is that the period until March 1997
> is a technology transition period, where new Ada compilers can be validated
> against either the Ada83 or Ada95 standard. DoD policy, expressed in
> directive 3405-1, currently only allows Ada83. And NIST, the sole authority
> for US Government language standards apparently removed its logo from
> current Ada95 validation certificates on the grounds that the Ada95
> validation suite 2.0 is only about half complete.
>
> -- Dan Eilers
>
Dan, could you explain a bit more about what is going on with NIST and Ada
95 validation? Also, my reading of 3405.1 seems to imply that everyone
should now be using Ada 95 since that is now Ada, although it is not yet
desirable or even possible for everyone to use Ada 95.
Thanks.
-- David
next parent reply other threads:[~1996-01-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <DKCGu6.7GD@irvine.com>
1996-01-08 0:00 ` David D. Shochat [this message]
1996-01-08 0:00 ` ada for pc(dos an linux) Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox