Re: AdaOpenGL and AdaMultimedia

[Markus E L <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>]

Poul-Erik Andreasen wrote:

> Markus E L wrote:
>> Poul-Erik Andreasen wrote:
>>
>>> Markus E L wrote:
>>>> Alexis Muller wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> This may interest someone. I have worked on the AdaOpenGL binding. The
>>>>> idea is to use Ada typing instead of C style (naming convention and
>>>>> const int). I have also translate in Ada lot of samples for the opengl
>>>>> book. You can get this work from the project's CVS
>>>>> ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/adaopengl/ ), but I need to finish it
>>>>> before doing a new release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have also start a new project : AdaMultimedia
>>>>> ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/adamultimedia/ ). The goal is to
>>>>> provide a library to handle multimedia files. Like ffmpeg but in Ada ;)
>>>>> For now it can be decode bmp pictures, AVI containers and the cinepak
>>>>> codec. I am working on jpeg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to send me a mail if you what more information.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>> GMPGPL instead of LGPL would be nice.
>>> That's not a god idea since the original is a
>>> BSD'style licens :-)
>> Which original? And why is original-BSD-Adaversion-LGPL better than
>> original-BSD-Adaversion-GMGPL? Whatever the "original" is here ....
>>
>
> None of them are alowed, you can not make a BSD licence to
> a LGPL or GMGPL ( at least not this one);
>
> I am only talking abount the adaopengl. The AdaMultimedia
> are a brand new project as Alexis also points out

And I'm talking about AdaMultimedia as evidenced by "instead" in
"GMPGPL instead of LGPL would be nice". So I'm still confused about
"That's not a god idea since the original is a BSD'style licens" and
do think you've missed my point.

Regards -- Markus