Re: Announcing JGNAT public version 1.0p

["John Merryweather Cooper" <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net>]

Oh, I agree totally!  I did read it.  But I was STILL curious what it would
do.  So, I tried it.  :)  (What the ****, I have both versions installed . .
.)  I'm guilty of being "redundant," but I thought it was an important
aspect to test.  Unfortunately, I've seen way too much documentation that
has little to do with reality or the current state of affairs with a
particular piece of software.  It's nice to have things confirmed.

BTW, since the Sun JDK is the "standard," isn't this really a bug issue for
the M$ VM and not a failure of JGNAT?

jmc
===========================
"Robert Dewar" <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8c92nl$nqn$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <sefra8s2eop75@corp.supernews.com>,
>   "John Merryweather Cooper" <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net> wrote:
>
> > I wasn't SURPRISED that the M$ VM failed (it actually fails
> > twice).  Just curious as to how it would behave.
>
> My point was simply that this should certainly not be a surprise
> since it is documented in the readme file :-)
>
> A general note here is that the readme file is one of the most
> critical parts of the documentation for a given release. It is
> where all last minute information is found, and also where we
> put target dependent information about any system
> incompatibilities etc.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.