From: "Vladimir Olensky" <vladimir_olensky@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Type size vs. actual size difference.
Date: 2000/03/20
Date: 2000-03-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sdcrh49flul21@corp.supernews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8b5n8c$kkl$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar wrote in message <8b5n8c$kkl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>In article <sdcm3eaplul93@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Vladimir Olensky" <vladimir_olensky@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Topic name was: Size (novice question).
>
>(not relevant stuff snipped)
>
>Vladimir, you translated 214 bytes into 214 bits in your
>reading, and thus answered a completely different question!
Oops, I see .
Probably I was a little bit tired and a wrong trigger switched
on in my mind :-)
Thanks,
Vladimir Olensky
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-20 0:00 Type size vs. actual size difference Bruce Detter
2000-03-20 0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
2000-03-20 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-03-20 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
2000-03-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-20 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox