From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: About 0Y interfaces
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:08:16 +1000
Date: 2005-10-19T19:08:16+10:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sa4irvtlvr3.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: A6KdnXpRrONX8sjeRVn-qA@megapath.net
>>>>> "Randy" == Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
Randy> Personally, I find implementation inheritance to be more
Randy> useful than interface inheritance, but obviously others
Randy> feel differently. And, in any case, interfaces allow using
Randy> OOP with tasks and protected types, which wasn't a
Randy> possibility in Ada 95.
How?
(yes... ok... my imagination is limited tonight...)
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-19 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-18 12:49 About 0Y interfaces Alex R. Mosteo
2005-10-18 13:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-10-18 14:34 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2005-10-18 16:54 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-10-18 16:36 ` Pascal Obry
2005-10-18 22:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-10-19 9:08 ` Brian May [this message]
2005-10-19 21:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-10-20 6:44 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2005-10-19 9:11 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox