From: "Vladimir Olensky" <vladimir_olensky@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Bugs or Mistakes?
Date: 1999/11/13
Date: 1999-11-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s2q7ltj2hsq62@corp.supernews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1999Nov12.201602.1@eisner
Larry Kilgallen wrote in message <1999Nov12.201602.1@eisner>...
>
>My experience has been that organizations with the guts to use
>the term "defect" have a better chance at good quality control.
>Your mileage may vary.
In industry where I have been working for many years
before my current work there were no such word
as "bug". There were such words as "design flaw",
"error" and "defect" and that resulted in very
strict and tight quality control methodology.
Word "bug" implies something that lives independently
from it's creator and thus creator is not so much
responsible for what he did (or did not do to prevent this).
Regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-12 0:00 Bugs or Mistakes? MaryAnn Atkinson
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-15 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-15 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-11-15 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Marin Condic
1999-11-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-20 0:00 ` Michael Stark
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky [this message]
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-13 0:00 ` M.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox