Re: Constant record components

[Craig Carey <research@ijs.co.nz>]

On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 18:53:30 -0500, "Randy Brukardt" wrote:
>"ME" <abcdefg@nonodock.net> wrote in message
...
>
>So the existence of discriminants don't prove much about the feasibility of
>constant record components.

It seems that implementing constant record fields may be extremely
easy. No new code is generated.

Jim Moore (ie. the official mouthpiece of USA, incl Hawaii) would hint
that ISO standards are almost what every man would desire. He and
Mr Leroy seem to achieve incredibly little over very long time
intervals.

I guess that the work involves some non-flag_burning of a NY GPL and
 forking up one of the free Adas.

'constant' record fields would not be constant inside of the body of
 the package that defines them.

For GNAT, a language formally (in the IBM + France style) INCOMPATIBLE
with any ISO standard of Geneva, would be willed into place using
(say):

  -notdewarmode 3

Isn't it the case that the pale blue at Mr Dewar's website got
darker. I was considering copying and colourizing the website.
I see Duff has write access to GNAT.

Our university educational standards website was pale blue but junked
that are many months of scandals over lax religious-grade internal
quality (cf Adacore's tardy orced-upon-it approx Oct 2002 decision to
make all discussions secret)L
   http://www.ncea.govt.nz/
Our phone company oversight agency is a bit pale blue (does nothing):
   http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/StandardSummary____105.aspx

How is Janus coming along ?.

______________
Craig Carey,
NZ ISPs:  http://www.ispmap.co.nz/searchisp.php
http://www.netguide.co.nz/shopping/directory/index.php?directory=highspeed