From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic.brenta@insalien.org>
Subject: Re: Generic formal access types
Date: 02 May 2003 11:14:36 +0200
Date: 2003-05-02T11:14:36+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rw2of2l4sn7.fsf@lbrenta.corp.emc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3eb11a85@epflnews.epfl.ch
Do you absolutely have to return null in one of the functions of your
generic package? How about raising an exception instead? Something
along the lines of:
generic
type Element (<>) is private;
package List is
No_Element_Error: Exception;
type List is private;
function Get_Element (L : List) return Element;
private
type List is ... ;
end List;
package body List is
function Get_Element (L : List) return Element is
begin
raise No_Element_Error; -- instead of return null
end Get_Element;
end List;
I'm sure you've thought about that, but I'm curious to know why it
wouldn't work for you.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-02 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-30 18:30 Generic formal access types
2003-04-30 19:27 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-01 8:58 `
2003-04-30 21:42 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-01 9:06 `
2003-05-01 9:58 ` Martin Krischik
2003-05-01 13:00 `
2003-05-02 9:14 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2003-05-02 10:43 `
2003-05-02 10:50 `
2003-05-01 10:09 `
2003-05-02 1:14 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 9:52 `
2003-05-02 16:18 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 16:57 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-02 19:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-05-05 8:14 `
2003-05-05 16:40 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-05-05 17:34 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox