Re: 2dsa | !2dsa ?

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

"Rod Kay" <rodakay5@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:30f2c0d8-58c2-4ca9-bfd6-2aa38309d27cn@googlegroups.com...
>Apologies for the prior empty post.
>
>Is it likely that the ARG might address the aformentioned issues ?

As of now, it doesn't appear that there would be any point. Annex E is an 
optional annex, and so far as we're aware, no compiler vendor has any plans 
for increasing support for that annex. So the ARG could change the annex but 
it seems unlikely that any changes would make it into implementations. 
(We've been told not to expect even the implementation of bugs fixes 
included in Ada 202x, even from the vendor that originally requested the bug 
fixes.)

                                      Randy.