From: rracine@draper.com (Roger Racine)
Subject: Re: discriminant
Date: 1999/07/13
Date: 1999-07-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rracine.23.0007EE28@draper.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 378a9c0e.2792962@news.dsuper.net
In article <378a9c0e.2792962@news.dsuper.net> fluffy_puff@dsuper.net writes:
>Is there a significant difference between GNAT and Aonix in the number
>of bugs they have ? I recently dowloaded GNAT but haven't used it
>yet. I noticed it's quite a bit smaller than the Aonix package, but
>still I would prefer less bugs and less features than the opposite.
>I've been told the Aonix debugger also does some funny things with
>pointers sometimes.
I have not used the Aonix product enough to give you a good comparison. I am
currently using GNAT on a project that requires inexpensive access to the
source to the runtime routines. Since GNAT is unique in this respect, no
evaluation was done.
Sorry.
Roger Racine
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-07-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-07-11 0:00 discriminant fluffy_doo
1999-07-12 0:00 ` discriminant Roger Racine
1999-07-12 0:00 ` discriminant fluffy_doo
1999-07-12 0:00 ` discriminant Roger Racine
1999-07-13 0:00 ` discriminant fluffy_puff
1999-07-13 0:00 ` discriminant Ted Dennison
1999-07-13 0:00 ` discriminant fluffy_dong
1999-07-15 0:00 ` discriminant Ted Dennison
1999-07-16 0:00 ` discriminant fluffy_puff
1999-07-13 0:00 ` Roger Racine [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-01-13 0:00 discriminant AGBOH CHARLES
1997-01-13 0:00 ` discriminant KJPrice
1997-01-15 0:00 ` discriminant Michael F Brenner
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox