From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com>
Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ in defense projects
Date: 2000/11/04
Date: 2000-11-04T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rh5N5.1060$uG5.157095@nnrp2.sbc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net
"E. Robert Tisdale" <edwin@netwood.net> wrote in message
news:3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net...
<snip>
> If you can find an Ada compiler which emits byte code for a JVM,
> you may be able to convince them that they should implement
> safety critical applications in Ada instead of Java.
> Otherwise, you should probably just forget about Ada.
I'm curious about something, based upon this and other posts by you. I
know you've done some work in C++ and have submitted posts on the
subject in other newsgroups. What is your professional experience
with Ada?
pat rogers
progers@classwide.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-03 0:00 Ada vs. C++ in defense projects michael_p_card
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Tom Hargraves
2000-11-05 2:31 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Pat Rogers [this message]
2000-11-05 4:35 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 5:42 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-05 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-11-06 0:00 ` John Griffiths
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-30 16:04 Is the Ada World Embarrassed by the Defense Industry? Ken Garlington
2000-10-30 21:36 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-10-31 4:10 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-31 16:50 ` mjsilva
2000-11-03 0:00 ` Ada vs. C++ in defense projects Michael P. Card
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Jeff Stimson
2000-11-04 0:00 ` Robert Love
2000-11-04 0:00 ` E. Robert Tisdale
2000-11-05 0:57 ` Jeff Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox