From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Overriding Default_Component_Value in derived array type
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:43:59 -0500
Date: 2020-04-28T00:43:59-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <r88fqv$sgb$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: hgh2svFi1oqU1@mid.individual.net
"Niklas Holsti" <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> wrote in message
news:hgh2svFi1oqU1@mid.individual.net...
...
>> But be careful that you're not using an inherited routine (that would
>> of course use the value for it's own type).
> Would that happen (inherited routine using the value for its own type)
> even if you repeal 13.1(10)?
Yes, of course. We're not going to start requiring dispatching for untagged
types. Anything else would be a nasty distributed overhead.
Randy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 18:13 Overriding Default_Component_Value in derived array type Niklas Holsti
2020-04-21 21:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-04-24 21:09 ` Niklas Holsti
2020-04-28 5:43 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox