Re: GNAT 3.14 NEW FEATURES LIST Current as of May 30th, 2001

[Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen)]

In article <GFpqKp.Gvr@news.boeing.com>, nickerson@mirage.boeing.com () writes:

> (in regards 3.14 GNAT release notes current as of 30-May-2001 
> which I applaud and hope to see more of):
> 
> 
> In article <3B3CE920.ACCC7295@easystreet.com>, Al Christians says...
> |>
> |>I agree 100%.  BTW, I didn't mean to be negative by asking a question.
> |>There was plenty of good news in the list. 
> 
> questions and discussion about what we find in the release notes 
> is certainly NOT negative; if some of the ACT design decisions need
> examining or rationale then so much the better; heck if it breaks
> current code then even a bit of friendly whining is okay by me; 

Even if it _doesn't_ break current code, the discussion hopefully will
reinforce with somebody somewhere the need to care about breaking
existing software when making changes (not just in compilers).