* general comment on CLA @ 1997-09-18 0:00 Robert Dewar 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 1997-09-18 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Am I the only one who feels that CLA seems taken over by cross-posted junk language wars? I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following, but if other people feel that these kinds of threads are reasonable, fine. Robert Dewar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-18 0:00 general comment on CLA Robert Dewar @ 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff ` (2 more replies) 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk 2 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Brian Rogoff @ 1997-09-18 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) I agree, but I don't think leaving the ng to the Eiffel/Java/C++/... language wars is the right thing to do. Some language comparison posts are appropriate, though I wish people making the comparisons had at least minimal familiarity with the languages being compared. Right now I just manually delete most junk postings. I find it sad that a lot of people who used to post in years past (S.Barbey, M. Kempe, and Rob Nebbe immediately come to mind) seem to have left. I for one learned much from their postings. Hopefully you won't join them. -- Brian On 18 Sep 1997, Robert Dewar wrote: > Am I the only one who feels that CLA seems taken over by cross-posted > junk language wars? > > I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following, but if other > people feel that these kinds of threads are reasonable, fine. > > Robert Dewar > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff @ 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Moderation? :-( (Was Re: general comment on CLA) Brian Rogoff 1997-09-19 0:00 ` general comment on CLA Joerg Rodemann 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Tom Moran 2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert A Duff @ 1997-09-19 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) >On 18 Sep 1997, Robert Dewar wrote: >> I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following, but if other >> people feel that these kinds of threads are reasonable, fine. It's not *that* bad, Robert. Don't go away. Yes, the cross-posted language wars contain mostly nonsense posted by people who don't know what they're talking about, but they do contain *some* useful discussion. For example, I find the argument about Ada-style exception handling vs Eiffel's "retry" thing somewhat interesting. And separate specs vs short-flat tools (although that one is getting repetetive). At least it's Eiffel vs Ada, which have enough in common that the differences are worth discussing. If it bores you, kill-file it. All in all, I'd say comp.lang.ada has better signal-to-noise than any newsgroup I've read (except comp.compilers, which is moderated, so language comparisons get squelched if they start getting too "war"-like). Just be glad that the Ada vs Red language "war" isn't crossposted to comp.lang.red. ;-) - Bob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Moderation? :-( (Was Re: general comment on CLA) 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff @ 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Robert S. White 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Brian Rogoff @ 1997-09-20 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Robert A Duff wrote: > >On 18 Sep 1997, Robert Dewar wrote: > >> I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following, but if other > >> people feel that these kinds of threads are reasonable, fine. > > It's not *that* bad, Robert. Don't go away. De gustibus non est disputandum (except on the Internet). FWIW, I agree with Robert. (You'll have to do some overload resolution to determine which one :-). I *hate* to suggest it, but maybe it is time for a moderated cla. I used to read c.l.scheme, which had a similarly high SNR, but thats going down fast too. Expect every Java programmer who can spell ADA will be posting their opinion on the American Dental Association here as soon as they learn about Ada -> JVM compilers. > All in all, I'd say comp.lang.ada has better signal-to-noise than any > newsgroup I've read (except comp.compilers, which is moderated, so > language comparisons get squelched if they start getting too > "war"-like). This sounds like an argument for going to a moderated NG :-(. One argument for the contrary though, is that reading some of the slams on Ada from the Eiffel community really made me glad I decided to look into Ada a few years ago, since many of the things that Eiffelists find awful about Ada (modules /= types, separation of spec and body, Ada exceptions, ...) are things I really like in Ada. Peter Hermann made a similar observation, though I don't know if this justifies all of the crossposting. -- Brian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Moderation? :-( (Was Re: general comment on CLA) 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Moderation? :-( (Was Re: general comment on CLA) Brian Rogoff @ 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Robert S. White 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert S. White @ 1997-09-21 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <Pine.SGI.3.95.970920122419.5046A-100000@shellx.best.com>, bpr@shellx.best.com says... >... though I don't know if this justifies all of the crossposting. Ok OK, I _promise_ never to reply to one of those cross-posted lanuguage-wars monsters (threads) again. Let them die out! Anything to keep the CLA S/N ratio high :) _____________________________________________________________________ Robert S. White -- An embedded systems software engineer e-mail reply to reverse of: ia us lib cedar-rapids crpl shift2 whiter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff @ 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Joerg Rodemann 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Tom Moran 2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Joerg Rodemann @ 1997-09-19 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Brian Rogoff (bpr@shellx.best.com) wrote: > I agree, but I don't think leaving the ng to the Eiffel/Java/C++/... > language wars is the right thing to do. Some language comparison posts are > appropriate, though I wish people making the comparisons had at least > minimal familiarity with the languages being compared. Right now I just > manually delete most junk postings. > On 18 Sep 1997, Robert Dewar wrote: > > Am I the only one who feels that CLA seems taken over by cross-posted > > junk language wars? > > > > I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following, but if other > > people feel that these kinds of threads are reasonable, fine. It really would be a sad story for c.l.a. and a shame for all who partici- pated in those lengthy Eiffel-Ada-threads (including me) if it leads to the loss of a valuable member of this newsgroup. Certainly there was a lot of repetition as well as some harsh words that did not seem appropriate. However some of the postings lead to some interesting thoughts and insights for me. Also it illustrated how strongly the terminology and way of thinking is influenced by a regular use of just one language. (Hope I am not becoming somewhat c-ish. :-) ). So I would hope that we do not loose valuable input for this group by getting to involved in such language wars. At some point this newsgroup would then become totally uninteresting and not a good promotion for Ada since this newsgroup may often --- at least for students --- be one of the entry points towards this beautiful (but not perfect) language. Regards Joerg -- rodemann@mathematik.uni-ulm.de | Dipl.-Phys. Joerg S. Rodemann Phone: ++49-(0)711-5090670 | Flurstrasse 21, D-70372 Stuttgart, Germany -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- rodemann@rus.uni-stuttgart.de | University of Stuttgart, Computing Center Phone: ++49-(0)711-685-5815 | Visualization Department, Office: 0.304 Fax: ++49-(0)711-678-7626 | Allmandring 30a, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff 1997-09-19 0:00 ` general comment on CLA Joerg Rodemann @ 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Tom Moran 1997-09-19 0:00 ` John Herro 2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Tom Moran @ 1997-09-19 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) >I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following Non carborundum illegitimati, as they say. Newsgroups are (potentially) too valuable to give up just because of the trash. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Tom Moran @ 1997-09-19 0:00 ` John Herro 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: John Herro @ 1997-09-19 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Robert Dewar wrote: > I am about to decide that CLA > is no longer worth following Remember that reverend who was a self-righteous flamer? Together we've been through MUCH worse than language wars. Thank God for the delete button! - John Herro Software Innovations Technology http://members.aol.com/AdaTutor ftp://members.aol.com/AdaTutor ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-19 0:00 ` John Herro @ 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 1997-09-21 0:00 ` John Herro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 1997-09-20 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) John said << Remember that reverend who was a self-righteous flamer? Together we've been through MUCH worse than language wars. Thank God for the delete button!>> This is different for a number of reasons. First the total number of messages from CJIII was small, and they were easily ignored. Second, kill files worked fairly well. But this cross-posted suff keeps changing subject lines, and involves a giant cast of Eiffel etc characters who are not so easy to kill. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar @ 1997-09-21 0:00 ` John Herro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: John Herro @ 1997-09-21 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Robert Dewar said > But this cross-posted suff ... > [is] not so easy to kill. I don't know about most news readers, but the one built into the AOL software automatically organizes all the postings by threads, and to delete a whole thread, I need only click on the name of the thread and the delete button. (On the other hand, so far as I know the AOL software doesn't support kill files.) - John Herro Software Innovations Technology http://members.aol.com/AdaTutor ftp://members.aol.com/AdaTutor ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-18 0:00 general comment on CLA Robert Dewar 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff @ 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk 2 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Larry Kilgallen @ 1997-09-19 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <dewar.874621342@merv>, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > Am I the only one who feels that CLA seems taken over by cross-posted > junk language wars? I strongly agree. Those discussions need their own home (perhaps there is such a group, but I am not familiar with it). (Off topic, I would not mind a newsreader that totally ignored posts addressed to more than N groups.) > I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following, but if other > people feel that these kinds of threads are reasonable, fine. Well, Robert Dewar, that to me seems totally illogical !!! :-) Basing your participation (which I value) on others wanting the garbage threads seems to say you will participate in anything labeled CLA so long as those participating in it (aside from you) agree on the content. I would much prefer that those who are interested in less of the non-Ada content consider ways of reducing it. Of course that is not appropriate without a sense that more than 3 people feel this way. Larry Kilgallen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen @ 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert A Duff @ 1997-09-19 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <1997Sep19.103110.1@eisner>, Larry Kilgallen <kilgallen@eisner.decus.org> wrote: >I strongly agree. Those discussions need their own home (perhaps there >is such a group, but I am not familiar with it). There's comp.lang.misc. Periodically, somebody posts a note there saying, "I'm thinking of learning how to program. Which language should I learn first?" And this results in an endless series of inane rants, including several libelous comments about Bertrand Meyer or Grady Booch. And there's comp.lang.object, which sometimes contains discussions/wars about OO languages. (If you think Ada-vs-Eiffel is bad, you should see C++ vs Smalltalk!) Best of all is comp.compilers. The moderator allows a limited amount of language discussion, but mostly it's about *implementing* languages. >... (Off topic, I would >not mind a newsreader that totally ignored posts addressed to more than >N groups.) My kill file kills anything posted to more than 3 groups, and anything with ALL CAPS words in the title (which is usually something like FREE MONEY AVAILABLE, or worse). >I would much prefer that those who are interested in less of the non-Ada >content consider ways of reducing it. Of course that is not appropriate >without a sense that more than 3 people feel this way. I like language comparison discussions, and if one of the languages is Ada, that seems on-topic for comp.lang.ada. I just wish people would refrain from posting misinformation and religious zealotry (which seems to go up roughly as the square of the number of cross-posted groups). And I wish everyone would be polite. - Bob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff @ 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Simon Wright 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu 1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Robert Dewar @ 1997-09-20 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Larry said <<<<I strongly agree. Those discussions need their own home (perhaps there is such a group, but I am not familiar with it). (Off topic, I would not mind a newsreader that totally ignored posts addressed to more than N groups.)>> I have investigated, and as far as I know, no newsreader has this capability. I have on my list to hack one so it does, but goodness knows when I get around to that. As far as it being illogical for me to wonder whether continued participation in CLA is worth while, I don't see that. The value of spending time following a newsgroup, and answering articles is in direct proportion to the signal-to-noise ratio, and for the last few weeks, CLA has exceeded my threshhold. I used to follow a lot of groups, including for example OS/2 and comp.lang.cobol, but after a while they just had far too much junk in them, and now I only follow CLA. Most other people at ACT abandoned CLA a long time ago, on these grounds. Really I was trying to get a sense of how people feel about these cross-posted threads. If generally CLA folks feel they are reasonable, then I certainly don't want to try to impose my views, but it is certainly not illogical for me to find it too much of a waste of time to wade through more cross-posted stuff. On the other hand, if others generally agree, perhaps we could conduct a cleanup campaign :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar @ 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Simon Wright 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Simon Wright @ 1997-09-21 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > Really I was trying to get a sense of how people feel about these > cross-posted threads. If generally CLA folks feel they are reasonable, > then I certainly don't want to try to impose my views, but it is > certainly not illogical for me to find it too much of a waste of time > to wade through more cross-posted stuff. > > On the other hand, if others generally agree, perhaps we could conduct > a cleanup campaign :-) I've been skipping the Eiffel ramblings except where someone interesting (eg, Robert) has been contributing I guess the beginnings of a cleanup campaign would be to be extra careful when replying to crossposted articles .. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Simon Wright @ 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Tardieu @ 1997-09-21 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Dewar >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> writes: Robert> I have investigated, and as far as I know, no newsreader has Robert> this capability. I have on my list to hack one so it does, Robert> but goodness knows when I get around to that. Gnus (see http://www.gnus.org/), the (IMHO) best newsreader (and also mailreader) so far can do this very easily and this is even a FAQ. For people who could be interested in Gnus, it is a software running under (X)Emacs written by Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen (lmi@gnus.org) which is very powerful. Since it runs under Emacs, it is available on almost every Unix platforms and under Windows NT. I couldn't recommend another news software since Gnus has unique features, such as: (some may be incorporated in other newsreaders, but probably not all of them) - adaptive scoring: if you want, Gnus can keep track of what words and combination of words you seem to be interested in. This way, it will increase the score of the threads containing these words; when you enter the group, the messages which are probably of highest interest to you are rpesented first - various backends: Gnus can read news and mail using NNTP, spool, Unix mail file, MH files, POP, IMAP, ... Your mails can be sorted into different groups (that have different priorities) based on the subject, the sender, the recipient, the body, ... Mails are shown just as news posts are, that is threaded, with priorities, with score and kill files, ... - some really useful backends such as the nnweb one: I can create a group which will consist into *any* article archived by Dejanews or Altavista for example containing the "Ada" word in the subject field. Gnus will make a HTTP connection to the search engine and will build an ephemeral group containing all the headers. When you ask for an article, it will get it from the same source and present it to you - the current development version (called Quassia Gnus) contains a new "agent" which allows off-line mail and news reading and posting. When you're plugged in, Gnus downloads the new mails and news posts and sends the one it has queued for you when you were off-line - fully integrated MIME support using TM. If you get a picture by mail and are running XEmacs, then the picture will be presented in your regular mail buffer if you are running under X It would take too much time and space to describe all the great Gnus features. It is really worth a try. And it is... free software :) Gnus is part of the recent Emacs and XEmacs releases. GNUS (the former newsreader which has inspired Gnus) could only read news, so make sure you are running a pretty recent (X)Emacs. Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@ada.eu.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA 1997-09-18 0:00 general comment on CLA Robert Dewar 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen @ 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk 2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Jerry van Dijk @ 1997-09-20 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <dewar.874621342@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu writes: >Am I the only one who feels that CLA seems taken over by cross-posted >junk language wars? > >I am about to decide that CLA is no longer worth following, but if other >people feel that these kinds of threads are reasonable, fine. I noticed myself skipping more and more threads lately. However, CLA is the only general forum we have on Ada, so I at least will continue monitoring, although I've become less of of a participant lately. Perhaps it will get better again... -- -- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland -- Consultant | Team Ada -- Ordina Finance | jdijk@acm.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: general comment on CLA
@ 1997-09-20 0:00 Marc Wachowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Marc Wachowitz @ 1997-09-20 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) wrote:
> I would
> not mind a newsreader that totally ignored posts addressed to more than
> N groups.
Gnus, the news- and mail-reader built onto GNU Emacs, can do this, and
much more which would be hard using other programs for that purpose.
(Gnus runs at least on various kinds of Unix and on Windows NT, and I
think it should work on Windows 95, too.)
-- Marc Wachowitz <mw@ipx2.rz.uni-mannheim.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-09-21 0:00 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 1997-09-18 0:00 general comment on CLA Robert Dewar 1997-09-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Moderation? :-( (Was Re: general comment on CLA) Brian Rogoff 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Robert S. White 1997-09-19 0:00 ` general comment on CLA Joerg Rodemann 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Tom Moran 1997-09-19 0:00 ` John Herro 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 1997-09-21 0:00 ` John Herro 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen 1997-09-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Simon Wright 1997-09-21 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu 1997-09-20 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 1997-09-20 0:00 Marc Wachowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox