From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Access types and classwide programming
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:57:58 GMT
Date: 2001-09-17T04:57:58+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qpfp7.15438$L%5.12873076@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: nW1p7.17633$mj6.2402202@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com
> For x'address use blah;
> ...
> (PC with Win9x)
You're barking up the wrong tree if you start worrying about address
clauses for an OS on x86 machines - they use IO instructions, not memory
mapped IO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-17 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-15 19:36 Access types and classwide programming chris.danx
2001-09-15 20:28 ` chris.danx
2001-09-15 23:42 ` [Different Topic] Endianess? chris.danx
2001-09-16 6:22 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-17 7:37 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 7:53 ` Assigning the value of a deferred constant? Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 14:04 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-17 14:36 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 17:36 ` tmoran
2001-09-18 8:16 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-18 18:40 ` Richard Riehle
2001-09-19 2:07 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-09-19 7:39 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-16 6:19 ` Access types and classwide programming Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-16 13:37 ` chris.danx
2001-09-16 16:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-16 18:24 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-09-17 6:15 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-17 4:57 ` tmoran [this message]
2001-09-17 14:16 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-16 9:32 ` tmoran
2001-09-17 9:41 ` John McCabe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox