From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Implementing Rust's borrow checked pointers
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:36:33 +0200
Date: 2019-09-25T06:36:33+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qmeqsh$15p$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bf5a548-4d06-4a95-87f6-1e1170b04c99@googlegroups.com>
Le 25/09/2019 à 00:09, Lucretia a écrit :
>> Can you provide a specific citation?
> No, I'm fairly sure I saw it in one of the AARM's under compilation requirements years ago, but I cannot find it now.
>
You may be confused by 4.9(34/3):
"The expression is illegal if its evaluation fails a language-defined
check other than Overflow_Check. For the purposes of this evaluation,
the assertion policy is assumed to be Check."
This means that it is an error if a static expression (evaluated at
compile-time) would raise an exception.
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 9:05 Implementing Rust's borrow checked pointers Lucretia
2019-09-24 9:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-09-24 11:23 ` Optikos
2019-09-24 12:02 ` Lucretia
2019-09-24 14:08 ` Optikos
2019-09-24 18:56 ` Simon Wright
2019-09-24 19:13 ` Keith Thompson
2019-09-24 20:15 ` Optikos
2019-09-24 20:31 ` Keith Thompson
2019-09-24 20:40 ` Optikos
2019-09-24 20:53 ` Keith Thompson
2019-09-24 22:09 ` Lucretia
2019-09-24 22:24 ` Keith Thompson
2019-09-25 4:36 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2019-09-25 15:04 ` Simon Wright
2019-09-24 12:23 ` Lucretia
2019-09-25 17:21 ` Stephen Leake
2019-09-24 16:24 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2019-09-25 16:26 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox