Re: potential Ada feature - comments?

["Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>]

On 2019-09-11 02:35, Matt Borchers wrote:
> Yes, I agree that a nested block is an option but it looks crappy and is it okay to complain that everything has to be unnecessarily indented to accommodate this fairly common construct?

"Finally" is IMO misleading. E.g. this would be wrong:

    declare
       File : File_Type;
    begin
       Open (File, ...);
       ...
    finally
       Close (File);
    end;

The problem of exception handlers sharing parts of code does exist, but 
"finally" is no solution because it is too crude. In practice there are 
2-3 different variants of finalization upon the subroutine exit. E.g. 
with exception vs. without exception.

I think that the solution must be based on contracts, exception 
contracts in particular to make it possible to declare resources as 
local and statically checking their releasing.

It also should be close to the place where the resource is claimed. One 
of many wrongs of "finally" is that it appears at the end of the block. 
It should rather be right after the call to Open, in my above. E.g.

    declare
       File : File_Type;
    begin
       Open (File, ...); -- Tell here to Close (File) afterwards!
       ...
    end;

And, of course, as a proponent of OO and strongly typed approach, I 
would rather have some syntax sugar for light-weight ad-hoc controlled 
wrapper types. E.g. to stuff File_Type into and delegate all operations 
of File_Type to it without writing 2k lines of brain-dead code.

P.S. Ada 83 is fine, but any language change would make it Ada 20XY anyway.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de