From: Per Sandberg <per.sandberg@bredband.net>
Subject: Re: Using "/" As Dot Replacement with GNAT
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:27:23 +0100
Date: 2009-01-01T16:27:23+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qh57l.110551$en7.96467@newsfe28.ams2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bd799d9-fbf0-4c72-83a6-f46d96c5831d@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
In theory it may work but in order to keep other tools then just the
compiler happy i would strongly recommend to use the standard GCC naming
conventions.
The project i work with professionally was using the APEX naming
convention that at least has support from the GNAT tool chain but there
are hiccups so we are considering a massive rename.
My recommendation would be:
* Stay with GCC naming convention for files i you don't want trouble.
/Per
Michael Rohan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Has anyone had any success using "/" as the dot replacement for file
> names with GNAT, i.e., the spec file for the package A.B.C would be a/
> b/c.ads? This would give a structure similar to the Java source
> structure.
>
> Take care,
> Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-01 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-27 23:24 Using "/" As Dot Replacement with GNAT Michael Rohan
2008-12-29 10:45 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2008-12-29 12:00 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-01-01 13:20 ` Ivan Levashew
2009-01-01 15:27 ` Per Sandberg [this message]
2009-01-05 7:31 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox