Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0

[Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>]

In article <Zlpu7.13306$ev2.22014@www.newsranger.com>, Ted Dennison says...
>
>In article <9pd0j8$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu>, David Starner says...
>>
>>On 2 Oct 2001 08:47:11 -0700, G. Fisher <gregfisher2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Does anyone know when a version (public or commercial) of GNAT that is
>>> compatable with GCC 3.0 will be available?  I'm told that this has
>>The way I understand it, never. The first GNAT based off of GCC 3.x will
>>be based off GCC 3.1, which they are approaching the freeze date on.
>
>According to what I read, the freeze date is tonight. So no-one bother Richard
>Kenner and the ACT folks until they get the rest of those "kinks" straightened
>out, OK? :-)

To clarify, that appears to be the freeze date for GCC 3.0.2, which the main
page says will be out sometime this month. The freeze date for 3.1 is the 15th
(for "major new functionality" anyway). I don't know enough about how the gcc
process works to say which will have the first appearance of Gnat.

---
T.E.D.    homepage   - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
          home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. 
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.