From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Moving away from GTK?
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 08:15:14 +0200
Date: 2013-07-27T08:15:14+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qcpkcy0ah769$.1p2n5gd3mx2p4.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a2d4df42-6086-4e57-81a3-a8e00d528962@googlegroups.com
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:16:06 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Sobczak wrote:
>> but Qt looks huge even comparing
>> to Gtk, not good for embedded solutions...
>
> Wrong. Qt is very modular and it looks huge due to all the non-GUI modules
> that come with it (network, XML, databases, etc.).
That is the same discussion as Ada for bare boards vs. full Ada. No matter
how modular it is, it is always all or nothing. Because it is not really
that modular, of course...
> The core part with GUI
> is quite manageable and if we are talking about embedded solutions, don't
> forget that Qt was acquired by Nokia (before it began to sink) - phones
> look like perfect examples of "embedded solutions" to me.
Ah, it was Qt that sunk Nokia! Could Qt to do that to MS too, as they have
Nokia now? That would be a great service... But no, they will do it in
Windows API... (:-))
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-27 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 17:14 Moving away from GTK? Alan Jump
2013-07-26 18:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-07-26 21:16 ` Maciej Sobczak
2013-07-26 22:02 ` Alan Jump
2013-07-27 6:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2013-07-27 5:59 ` Gour
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox