From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Possible Memory Leak
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:17:28 -0600
Date: 2004-11-23T15:17:28-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qaOdnRZE_70GNT7cRVn-qA@megapath.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fealnc.6t.ln@127.0.0.1
"R A Matthews" <ram@noone.nowhere> wrote in message
news:fealnc.6t.ln@127.0.0.1...
> This is probably one for the language lawyers...
...
> Is the Standard wrong?
Yes. We ran across this when we were developing Claw; the (now) SofCheck
front-end followed the Standard language to the letter, and its a mess. We
tried to fix the wording in the Corrigendum, but it took a long time to get
it right, so it had to wait for the Amendment (that is, Ada 2005). See
AI-147. (You'll note that there is a lot more confused in this area than
just 7.6.1(21).)
Randy Brukardt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-19 17:27 Possible Memory Leak R A Matthews
2004-11-22 23:00 ` Brian May
2004-11-23 19:09 ` RAMatthews
2004-11-23 21:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-11-23 21:17 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2004-11-25 17:49 ` RAMatthews
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox