* Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) @ 2005-06-24 20:23 Marin David Condic 2005-06-24 21:47 ` Jerry Petrey ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Marin David Condic @ 2005-06-24 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) In doing some research into other things, I bumped into the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS). This appears to be a relatively new initiative by the DoD and from what I can gather, they seem to want to open it up to some extent to commercial applications. Given that its all pretty new stuff, it looks like an opportunity for Ada to be a player in an emerging market - or at least a big DoD project. Does anybody know anything about the programming language(s) being used to develop versions of this radio? It looks like it is intended to have some sort of underlying OS and an API and then "radio apps" can be written to go on top of this and reconfigure the unit to different uses. Google turns up lots of stuff, but most of what I can find is not of a "Tutorial" nature. (Lots of stuff written in government-programese that talks about how wonderful its going to be one day.) It really does look like an opportunity for Ada if it hasn't already been locked up in some other language because of the possibility of writing numerous application programs for something relatively new in the world. Does anybody know much about this? MDC -- ====================================================================== Marin David Condic I work for: http://www.belcan.com/ My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/NSFrames.htm Send Replies To: m o d c @ a m o g c n i c . r "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried." -- G. K. Chesterton ====================================================================== ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) 2005-06-24 20:23 Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Marin David Condic @ 2005-06-24 21:47 ` Jerry Petrey 2005-06-26 11:59 ` Marin David Condic 2005-06-25 6:12 ` Jeffrey Carter 2005-07-10 20:42 ` Larry Kilgallen 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jerry Petrey @ 2005-06-24 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw) Marin David Condic wrote: > In doing some research into other things, I bumped into the Joint > Tactical Radio System (JTRS). This appears to be a relatively new > initiative by the DoD and from what I can gather, they seem to want to > open it up to some extent to commercial applications. > > Given that its all pretty new stuff, it looks like an opportunity for > Ada to be a player in an emerging market - or at least a big DoD > project. Does anybody know anything about the programming language(s) > being used to develop versions of this radio? It looks like it is > intended to have some sort of underlying OS and an API and then "radio > apps" can be written to go on top of this and reconfigure the unit to > different uses. > > Google turns up lots of stuff, but most of what I can find is not of a > "Tutorial" nature. (Lots of stuff written in government-programese that > talks about how wonderful its going to be one day.) It really does look > like an opportunity for Ada if it hasn't already been locked up in some > other language because of the possibility of writing numerous > application programs for something relatively new in the world. Does > anybody know much about this? > > MDC > Marin, We have just begun to work with JTRS on my project but Raytheon overall has been heavily involved with it for some time. Definitely some work is being done in Ada. The Army in Huntsville has done some good work on VMF (Variable Format Messages) handling software in Ada that they will share with DOD contractors. We are looking at it to support some upcoming demos. I agree with you that it is a good place for Ada to get a foothold. Jerry -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Jerry Petrey, - GNC Software Engineer, Raytheon Missile Systems -- -- NOTE: please perform appendectomy on email address before replying ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) 2005-06-24 21:47 ` Jerry Petrey @ 2005-06-26 11:59 ` Marin David Condic 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Marin David Condic @ 2005-06-26 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) When you start googling this up, you see all sorts of players involved. General Dynamics (because of the Future Combat System), Harris, Motorola, etc. It sounds vaguely similar to technology being used in cell phones. I wish I could turn up some resources that discuss it on a more technical level. I can't figure out how easy or hard it would be for a small group of entrepeneurs to develop something that might play in that field - and possibly give Ada a boost in the process. Qualcomm got started that way.... MDC Jerry Petrey wrote: > > We have just begun to work with JTRS on my project but Raytheon overall has > been heavily involved with it for some time. > Definitely some work is being done in Ada. The Army in Huntsville has done > some good work on VMF (Variable Format Messages) handling software in Ada that > they will share with DOD contractors. We are looking at it to support some > upcoming demos. > I agree with you that it is a good place for Ada to get a foothold. > -- ====================================================================== Marin David Condic I work for: http://www.belcan.com/ My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/NSFrames.htm Send Replies To: m o d c @ a m o g c n i c . r "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried." -- G. K. Chesterton ====================================================================== ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) 2005-06-24 20:23 Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Marin David Condic 2005-06-24 21:47 ` Jerry Petrey @ 2005-06-25 6:12 ` Jeffrey Carter 2005-07-10 20:42 ` Larry Kilgallen 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey Carter @ 2005-06-25 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw) Marin David Condic wrote: > In doing some research into other things, I bumped into the Joint > Tactical Radio System (JTRS). This appears to be a relatively new > initiative by the DoD and from what I can gather, they seem to want to > open it up to some extent to commercial applications. I worked in the late 1990s on a project called JCIT (I don't remember what it stood for anymore). It was a SW radio project done in Ada. The project was canceled for non-technical reasons. I don't know if any of that code is being reused on JTRS. Probably not, since doing so would make sense. -- Jeff Carter "No one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle, do you understand? Even--and I want to make this absolutely clear--even if they do say, 'Jehovah.'" Monty Python's Life of Brian 74 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) 2005-06-24 20:23 Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Marin David Condic 2005-06-24 21:47 ` Jerry Petrey 2005-06-25 6:12 ` Jeffrey Carter @ 2005-07-10 20:42 ` Larry Kilgallen 2005-07-10 21:36 ` Marin David Condic 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Larry Kilgallen @ 2005-07-10 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw) In article <4ZZue.12291$eM6.11698@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>, Marin David Condic <nobody@noplace.com> writes: > In doing some research into other things, I bumped into the Joint > Tactical Radio System (JTRS). This appears to be a relatively new > initiative by the DoD and from what I can gather, they seem to want to > open it up to some extent to commercial applications. > > Given that its all pretty new stuff, it looks like an opportunity for > Ada to be a player in an emerging market - or at least a big DoD > project. Does anybody know anything about the programming language(s) > being used to develop versions of this radio? It looks like it is > intended to have some sort of underlying OS and an API and then "radio > apps" can be written to go on top of this and reconfigure the unit to > different uses. > > Google turns up lots of stuff, but most of what I can find is not of a > "Tutorial" nature. (Lots of stuff written in government-programese that > talks about how wonderful its going to be one day.) since the above was posted, there has been some non-governmentese posted, but not quite favorable: <<< EISNER::DRA1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SECURITY.NOTE;1 >>> -< SECURITY >- ================================================================================ Note 297.692 RISKS-FORUM 692 of 692 EISNER::SYS_EISNER "Encompasserve Exec. Committee" 625 lines 10-JUL-2005 13:50 -< [RISKS] Risks Digest 23.93 >- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RISKS-LIST: Risks-Forum Digest Sunday 10 July 2005 Volume 23 : Issue 93 ACM FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks) Peter G. Neumann, moderator, chmn ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:32:46 +0100 (BST) From: Pete Mellor <pm@csr.city.ac.uk> Subject: Future Combat Systems procurement problems: GAO report Dawn S. Onley, GAO: Army's FCS initiative faces uncertain future, Government Computer News, 8 Jul 2005 The major communications programs that will support the Army's transformational Future Combat Systems initiative are in jeopardy of failing to meet technical challenges and an accelerated schedule, according to the Government Accountability Office. GAO found that each of the communications pillars of the Army's Future Combat Systems (FCS) program - two Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) clusters, the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) program and the System of Systems Common Operating Environment (SOSCOE) - would likely fail to meet aggressive schedules due to immature technologies. "As currently structured, the JTRS, WIN-T and SOSCOE programs are at risk of not delivering intended capabilities when needed, particularly for the first spiral of FCS," according to GAO. "They continue to struggle to meet an ambitious set of user requirements, steep technical challenges and stringent time frames." FCS is designed to link 18 manned and unmanned weapons systems via a common computer network known as WIN-T and the System of Systems Common Operating Environment. The Army restructured its FCS program last year into spirals, with officials announcing the first spiral would happen in fiscal 2008. But GAO said the first spiral may not demonstrate key networking capabilities. GAO found the FCS program faces network, developmental and financial challenges that continue to slow progress. FCS' information network is dependent on the success of JTRS, WIN-T and SOSCOE - programs that are not included in FCS costs. "Because JTRS, WIN-T and SOSCOE all rely on significant advances in current technologies and capabilities and must be fully integrated to realize FCS, there are substantial risks to this effort," wrote Paul L. Francis, GAO's director of acquisition and sourcing management, in the report. For the full article, with a link to the original GAO report, see: http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/36302-1.html Peter Mellor, Centre for Software Reliability, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB +44 (0)20 7040 8422 ------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) 2005-07-10 20:42 ` Larry Kilgallen @ 2005-07-10 21:36 ` Marin David Condic 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Marin David Condic @ 2005-07-10 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) It could be because they accelerated the schedule dramatically. Originally FCS was supposed to be fielded somewhere about 2015. I seem to have hit some info indicating it got pulled forward to 2008. You can accelerate some R&D by throwing gobs of money at it, but not always. Technological breakthroughs needed for JTRS or WIN-T might not be the kind of thing you can rush. Still, since JTRS seems to be an intensively software kind of thing and the type of thing that once defined, becomes a platform for a bunch of other things, it would be a shame if the core of it got built in C (or something else) and left Ada as an "Also Ran". The language used to implement the infrastructure is tough to supplant on the add-ons once it gets established. That's why I thought it would be an important deal for Ada to win. MDC Larry Kilgallen wrote: > > > since the above was posted, there has been some non-governmentese posted, > but not quite favorable: > -- ====================================================================== Marin David Condic I work for: http://www.belcan.com/ My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/NSFrames.htm Send Replies To: m o d c @ a m o g c n i c . r "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried." -- G. K. Chesterton ====================================================================== ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-10 21:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-06-24 20:23 Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Marin David Condic 2005-06-24 21:47 ` Jerry Petrey 2005-06-26 11:59 ` Marin David Condic 2005-06-25 6:12 ` Jeffrey Carter 2005-07-10 20:42 ` Larry Kilgallen 2005-07-10 21:36 ` Marin David Condic
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox