From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Concurrency in Ada Errata in word format not Post script format
Date: 15 Jan 2006 23:22:59 -0600
Date: 2006-01-15T23:22:59-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qDbrWAHpVmj3@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 11sm6cfebhs1a97@corp.supernews.com
In article <11sm6cfebhs1a97@corp.supernews.com>, "ME" <abcdefg@nonodock.net> writes:
> Does anyone know of a Word format of Concurrency in Ada errata? I have been
> suffering with this book for years now.
Is there reason to believe the authors of Concurrency in Ada would
choose word for their revisable format ?
Is there reason to believe the authors of Concurrency in Ada would
release their work in revisable format ?
There can be a very good reason for choosing Postscript.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-16 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-16 3:56 Concurrency in Ada Errata in word format not Post script format ME
2006-01-16 5:22 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2006-01-16 17:09 ` ME
2006-01-16 9:10 ` Adrien Plisson
2006-01-16 17:25 ` ME
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox