From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Question on speed of set operations
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:43:49 -0500
Date: 2019-04-01T16:43:49-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <q7u0mm$oq3$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lyh8bl2s3u.fsf@pushface.org
"Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message
news:lyh8bl2s3u.fsf@pushface.org...
> reinert <reinkor@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So what is the best alternative among the following tree procedures
>> for the above purpose (in terms of *speed*):
>
> If I were you I would do some benchmarking.
Agreed. I doubt that there is a portable answer; it would depend on the
internal implementation of the container type (which is purposely left to
the implementation).
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 22:39 Question on speed of set operations reinert
2019-03-29 23:11 ` Simon Wright
2019-04-01 21:43 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2019-04-02 6:03 ` reinert
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox