From: lyttlec <lyttlec@removegmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is this a gnat problem?
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:47:34 -0500
Date: 2019-02-19T17:47:34-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <q4i126$egd$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: q4hp3g$6dt$1@dont-email.me
On 2/19/19 3:31 PM, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> On 2/19/19 7:35 PM, Egil H H wrote:
>>
>> Aspect specifications for tasks/task types, should come before *is*,
>> like so:
>>
>> task type Cyclic (S : Any_Cyclic_State)
>> with Priority => S.Pri
>> is
>> end Cyclic;
>
> Yes, and a task type without entries doesn't need "is":
>
> task type Cyclic (S : Any_Cyclic_State) with Priority => S.Pri;
>
Well, Duh (Smacks forhead). My only excuse is that Burns & Wellings make
the same error several times.
Thanks, Guys.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 18:22 Is this a gnat problem? lyttlec
2019-02-19 18:33 ` Marek Kuziel
2019-02-19 18:35 ` Egil H H
2019-02-19 20:31 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2019-02-19 22:47 ` lyttlec [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox