From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Alignment issue
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:01:02 -0600
Date: 2019-02-18T17:01:02-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <q4fdfe$39o$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ly36onplmx.fsf@pushface.org
"Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message
news:ly36onplmx.fsf@pushface.org...
>I have code like this (written while working on a StackOverflow
> question), and GNAT ignores apparent alignment requests.
I wouldn't have expected Alignment to cause the effect, but when you specify
representation for a record type, any requirements on the components are can
be ignored. Perhaps GNAT is taking that somewhat too far??
Randy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-16 19:40 Alignment issue Simon Wright
2019-02-18 23:01 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox