Re: UTF-8 in strings - a bug?

["Björn Persson" <spam-away@nowhere.nil>]

Martin Krischik wrote:

> XMLAda comes with a Unicode library which can do some transcoding.

Well, I suppose the existence of that library is a good thing, but after 
reading the introduction in unicode.ads I have to wonder whether it's 
them or me who have misunderstood Unicode. It mentions "Utf32 Latin1" 
and "Utf8 Latin2" strings. This looks really weird to me. You don't 
encode Latin-1 in UTF-32 or Latin-2 in UTF-8. You encode Unicode in 
UTF-8 or UTF-32, or you encode a subset of Unicode in Latin-1, or 
another subset in Latin-2.

-- 
Björn Persson

jor ers @sv ge.
b n_p son eri nu