Re: Heartbleed

["Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>]

On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:02:24 +0200, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote:

> Le Sat, 12 Apr 2014 22:34:49 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov  
> <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a écrit:
>> It is a common delusion that mathematically correct results are correct
>> when dealing with a physical system.
> 
> Here is a related quote, from “Is computer science a branch of  
> mathematics?”
> http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/649408/is-computer-science-a-branch-of-mathematics/649526#649526
>>It is not uncommon to hear ideas along the lines that
>>  * Computer science is computer programming without practical  
>> constraints

I would say CS is science without programming.

>>   * Theoretical computer science is computer science without physical  
>> constraints

A science without engineering.

>>   * Mathematics is computer science without finiteness constraints

No. There is discrete mathematics, number theory, groups, linear
programming and optimization problems which are all about constraints.

Functional analysis (real numbers) and Peano arithmetic (integers) are
infinite => incomputable.

---------------------
BTW, there would be no problem to use a bignum library in Ada, if that were
useful. But for automation and control bignum is of little use, because it
would be a source of additional errors, such as violation of range,
accuracy, time, space constraints, such systems typically have.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de