From: G. B. <nonlegitur@nmhp.invalid>
Subject: Re: Licensing Paranoia and Manual Compilation Issues
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:50:45 -0000 (UTC)
Date: 2018-12-11T18:50:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pup0u5$g69$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6bee0ed3-c298-45c9-81b0-92cc90a1f2c6@googlegroups.com
<alexander@xn--junivrs-e1a.com> wrote:
> I've read some threads on here regarding the licensing situation of
> AdaCore's Libre compiler. For my upcoming project, I'm going to need (=
> very strong desire) to use Ada and I'm also going to need to be able to
> license the executable produced thereof in any way I desire.
For licensing in arbitrary ways, the aforementioned Ada distribution is not
the suitable one. Another compiler distribution might meet your needs,
including some FSF GNAT. GPL means tit-for-tat and thus intentionally puts
restrictions on licensing, no back doors.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 11:46 Licensing Paranoia and Manual Compilation Issues alexander
2018-12-11 16:11 ` Simon Wright
2018-12-11 16:31 ` Lucretia
2018-12-11 19:21 ` Simon Wright
2018-12-11 20:50 ` alexander
2018-12-11 23:45 ` Simon Wright
2018-12-12 9:34 ` alexander
2018-12-12 17:44 ` Simon Wright
2018-12-13 9:21 ` Björn Lundin
2018-12-13 10:30 ` alexander
2018-12-13 10:32 ` alexander
2018-12-11 18:50 ` G. B. [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox