From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Interface to aggregated type
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 21:43:22 +0200
Date: 2012-08-06T21:43:22+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pqmx0s03p9lk$.fbclercmsr1i.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8e844311-f470-4382-8acc-ffe30aee1c18@googlegroups.com
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:42:03 -0700 (PDT), ms wrote:
> Clearly `Request` aggregates `Header_Container`, as HTTP requests
> generally contain some set of headers.
>
> My dilemma is - `Headers` package already provides some sort of
> `Header_Container` manipulation interface - procedures for inserting and
> deleting headers and functions to return them, but I want allow these
> operations also on container aggregated inside `Request` type (which is
> probably a private record).
If Request implements the interface of Header_Container and also aggregates
it, why don't you derive one from another?
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-13 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-06 18:42 Interface to aggregated type ms
2012-08-06 19:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2012-08-06 20:28 ` ms
2012-08-06 19:56 ` Marius Amado-Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox