Re: Ada lacks lighterweight-than-task parallelism

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message 
news:pgdoip$1ntl$1@gioia.aioe.org...
...
> How adding features like low-level parallelism makes compiler smaller?

Nothing low-level about parallel loops. They're in fact a higher-level 
construct than an Ada task, since they're checked (by default) for safety 
problems and any tasking used is implicit. "Parallel" is mainly a hint to 
the compiler that parallelism can be used (there's almost no case today 
where a compiler could automatically use parallel code, as there would be a 
substantial risk of that code being slower than sequential code would be).

                                         Randy.