Re: about inheritance of subtypes and entities (such as constants) related to a type in the same package

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message 
news:pemv0i$1clu$1@gioia.aioe.org...
...
> I don't see any commonality. One method produces an independent type 
> another does a related types. If you mean specifically inheritance of 
> operations and the representation, that plays no role because of the 
> difference in the types.

The OP was asking specifically why subtypes and objects aren't inherited, so 
it surely plays a role in answering him. The difference in the definition of 
the types is irrelevant in how inheritance of other things is defined. One 
can argue that was wrong, but it is a fact.

                                                   Randy.