From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:36:12 +0200
Date: 2018-05-17T23:36:12+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pdkskb$1d7b$1@gioia.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: pdkrgg$n3g$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk
Le 17/05/2018 à 23:17, Randy Brukardt a écrit :
> No, I wouldn't bother with dispatching on access values at all. Since Ada
> passes all tagged objects by reference, and 'Unchecked_Access is always
> allowed on tagged parameters, it's always possible to get an access to a
> tagged parameter if that is needed. There's no reason to *pass* that value -
> just pass the tagged object.
Hmm... I don't remember the details, but wasn't it necessary for RACW
(Remote Access to Class Wide) types?
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 0:37 little precision about anonymous access types Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 1:08 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 1:18 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 14:51 ` AdaMagica
2018-03-19 22:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-03-20 17:49 ` G. B.
2018-03-20 23:56 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-21 22:46 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-15 0:20 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-15 0:28 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-15 21:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-16 8:14 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-16 8:23 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-17 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-17 21:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-17 21:36 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2018-05-18 7:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-05-15 21:44 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox