Re: little precision about anonymous access types

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

"Mehdi Saada" <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:6c1e643d-b826-4b8b-b61c-13c56428ed23@googlegroups.com...
> I should ask this in another way: what strategy do you use with 
> user-defined
>storage pools ? I can guess that since the user doesn't have as much
>"metalinguistic" on types and objects as the compiler, there's a limit to 
>how
>much automatic and complex one might for instance,
>build a default storage pool for anonymous access objects.

Allocate/deallocate with a named access type. As you noted, it is impossible 
to deallocate individual objects with anonymous access types.

Note there is an alternative (not recommended by me): use a storage subpool, 
assign the pool to all anonymous access types using pragma 
Default_Storage_Pool, allocate objects from appropriate subpools, and 
deallocate the objects using Unchecked_Deallocate_Subpool when no longer 
needed.

Or you can just avoid using anonymous access types everywhere and forget (as 
much as possible) that they exist. :-)

                            Randy.