From: Jeffrey Creem <jeff@thecreems.com>
Subject: Re: Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:44:28 -0400
Date: 2006-07-29T13:44:28-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pcjsp3-2vt.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.12.1154192651.32700.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:35:35 +0200
> Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> wrote:
>
>
>>I'd suggest using GMGPL. But this depends on what you want to achieve
>>with Qt4Ada:
>
>
> Does it matter if QT4Ada is GMGPL when QT is GPL? I mean shouldn't
> QT4Ada then be dual licensed so that whether one use the QT GPL or
> non-GPL version one do not get problems?
GMGPL is "GPL Compatible", so GMGPL can certainly be the only way this
library is licensed (assuming that meets the needs of the developers
that sign up).
So, I don't see a reason for dual license if GMGPL is what is selected.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-29 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-29 10:34 Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada Yves Bailly
2006-07-29 12:35 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 17:03 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-29 17:44 ` Jeffrey Creem [this message]
2006-07-29 21:50 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 18:17 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-29 19:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-07-29 14:24 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-31 20:57 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-01 2:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-08-03 7:51 ` Rob Norris
2006-08-01 11:35 ` Philippe Bertin
2006-08-01 21:55 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-05 19:47 ` Steve Whalen
2006-08-05 21:25 ` Michael Bode
2006-08-06 9:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox