From: cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.ed u!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!pasadena@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Logicon RDA)
Subject: Re: 2167A Questions
Date: 30 Jul 93 01:01:14 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pasadenaCAyDI3.71y@netcom.com> (raw)
Morris J. Zwick (mzwick@vitro.com) wrote:
: In article <1993Jul21.142339.20342@schbbs.mot.com> tannen@tigger.geg.mot.com
: (David Tannen) writes:
: >When working in 2167A I have tried to organize system in the following manne
r:
: >
: > CSU = package (ie Unit test is @ the package level)
: > CSC = subsystem(s) There can be multiple layers of CSCs if you want.
: > CSCI = whole system (all the CSCs)
: >
: >For instance:
: > Your system will have three different pieces of hardware (A,B,C) and
: > the system is called XYZ.
: >
: > Subdivide the system as so:
: > XYZ CSCI
: > A CSC
: > B CSC
: > C CSC
: >
: I'm not sure I agree with this. Typically, CSCI's are determined to be
: "autonomous" systems or subsystems. Code running on each piece of hardware ca
n
: generally be considered as separate subsystems. Perhaps my disagreement furth
er
: highlights some of the problems with 2167A.
: I'll try a different example. Say we have some weapons control system with tw
o
: computers, A&B. Let's say that computer A contains subsystems to track the
: target(a), determine if we can shoot at the target(b), and tell the equipment
: to do something about it(c). Let's say computer B contains subsystems to acce
pt
: sensor data (d) and control display devices (e).
: First, the CSUs in the system are represented by each procedure, function, or
: package in the system. This is the easiest part. Let's say in computer A, CSU
's
**** line deleted ****
Look at the name CSCI. A *Computer Software Configuration Item* is just
that. It is a deliverable unit. It is something a bean counter checks off
and pays for and does not know that is has CSCs inside. A system can have
more than one CSCI. In most cases one CSCI per executable unit.
A CSU is the thing that you unit test. Do you test the *seperates* or
the packages? you choice. mine is packages.
CSC can be anything to aid decomposition.
-- Chris ALbertson pasadena@netcom.com
next reply other threads:[~1993-07-30 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-07-30 1:01 cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.ed [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-07-27 16:50 2167A Questions Andy Simmons
1993-07-23 12:03 Colin James 0621
1993-07-23 0:47 MMC/CS 609-338-2922/8-794-2922
1993-07-22 13:34 david.c.willett
1993-07-22 12:37 Morris J. Zwick
1993-07-21 14:33 Donn Hines
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox