From: "Dr. Adrian Wrigley" <amtw@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
Subject: Re: PolyORB - building and applications
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:42:47 GMT
Date: 2006-09-19T09:42:47+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2006.09.19.09.46.43.430108@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uy7sg8b9b.fsf@stephe-leake.org
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:18:56 -0400, Stephen Leake wrote:
> "Dr. Adrian Wrigley" <amtw@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk> writes:
>
>
>> So I'm left with the stark choices:
>>
>> 1) Drop Annex E code altogether - don't use distributed code :(
>> 2) Use Annex E but drop GARLIC, replace with PolyORB DSA
>> 3) Use distributed code, but not Annex E (eg use CORBA)
>> 4) Debug the failing test-cases in GLADE
>> 5) Put up with the failures. Hope things'll get better.
>> 6) Something else(?)
>
> Use a supported compiler with Annex E.
Good idea!
What choices are there under $12,000? ($2000 might be OK)
--
Adrian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-19 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-18 15:56 PolyORB - building and applications Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-09-18 16:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-09-21 13:32 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-19 9:18 ` Stephen Leake
2006-09-19 9:42 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley [this message]
2006-09-19 10:31 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-09-19 10:49 ` Jerome Hugues
2006-09-19 11:04 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-09-19 12:26 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox