From: Wojtek Narczynski <wojtek@power.com.pl>
Subject: Re: Semantics of Inline vs non-Inline
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:57:01 +0200
Date: 2004-10-21T22:57:01+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2004.10.21.20.57.00.848360@power.com.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.43.1098357729.10401.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
>> "13/1 A representation or operational item that is not supported by the
>> implementation is illegal, or raises an exception at run time."
>
> OK, I stand corrected. But didn't you say your procedure, when inlined,
> produced an exception (and worked when not inlined)?
I am not the original poster, the original poster claims the program
'crashes'.
Regards,
Wojtek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-21 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-21 11:21 Semantics of Inline vs non-Inline Christoph Karl Walter Grein
2004-10-21 20:57 ` Wojtek Narczynski [this message]
2004-10-22 0:46 ` skidmarks
2004-10-22 5:50 ` Simon Wright
2004-10-22 12:57 ` Wojtek Narczynski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-21 5:07 Christoph Karl Walter Grein
2004-10-21 10:24 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-18 6:29 Christoph Karl Walter Grein
2004-10-20 15:07 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-15 6:18 Christoph Karl Walter Grein
2004-10-15 11:02 ` Wojtek Narczynski
[not found] <35f054ea.0410140733.5f250e6f@posting.google.com>
2004-10-14 16:14 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-14 20:05 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-10-15 10:24 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-15 16:32 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-10-14 17:58 ` Martin Krischik
2004-10-15 0:49 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-10-15 8:05 ` Martin Krischik
2004-10-15 16:39 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-10-15 16:40 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-10-15 16:40 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-10-15 16:45 ` skidmarks
2004-10-15 3:40 ` Steve
2004-10-15 5:50 ` Simon Wright
2004-10-15 16:57 ` skidmarks
2004-10-18 17:01 ` skidmarks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox