From: Wojtek Narczynski <wojtek@power.com.pl>
Subject: Re: Enumeration representation enhancement proposal
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:04:58 +0200
Date: 2004-10-20T13:04:58+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2004.10.20.11.04.57.583774@power.com.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: rlssm89daux.fsf@jacob.crs4.it
Hello,
>> Clearly, representation has no impact on comparison.
>
> Wrong.
> Is not correct Ada. The LRM clearly states (can't remember where,
> though) that the order of the representation should be the same as
> that of the original declaration of the enumeration.
You are right, I am wrong. I suppose I've never run into this, because
I've used enum rep very rarely, because it is not very useful...
I don't have an idea on how to fix it well, then.
Thanks taking taking the time to explain me.
Regards,
Wojtek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-14 9:31 Enumeration representation enhancement proposal Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-14 17:47 ` Nick Roberts
2004-10-15 11:06 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-19 14:55 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2004-10-20 8:41 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-20 8:58 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2004-10-20 11:04 ` Wojtek Narczynski [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox